This is Google's cache of http://www.leog.net/fujp_forum/topic.asp?whichpage=11&TOPIC_ID=8515. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on Jun 26, 2010 04:05:10 GMT. The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more

Text-only version
These search terms are highlighted: first release of my battery  
LeoG.net Ultra-Portables Forum - First release of my Battery Status/Monitoring app
LeoG.net Ultra-Portables Forum
LeoG.net Ultra-Portables Forum
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
 All Forums
 Fujitsu Ultra-Portables
 General Software Topics - Windows
 First release of my Battery Status/Monitoring app
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page
Author  Topic Next Topic
Page: of 11

tmt
Advanced Member

2766 Posts

Posted - 06/20/2010 :  12:53:38  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
So, the only issue is that it differs from other tools, i.e. it accurately tracks
changes on this particular CPU otherwise? Is it always off by 18 degrees?
Go to Top of Page

842x5
Starting Member

4 Posts

Posted - 06/21/2010 :  04:05:44  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
the CPU temp readout is wrong not only on Atom. It is also off by about 16 Celsius (too low) on other CPUs, e.g. BattStat reads out 44C, real temp is 60C on Dell D630 with Core2Duo T7500 @ 2.2GHz.
Btw, I checked the Aux temp. It is too low as well. On the D630 the Aux Temp maps to the Nvidia GPU. On other tools it reads, e.g. 55C, at the same time BattStat reads 40C...

Edited by - 842x5 on 06/21/2010 04:48:11
Go to Top of Page

tmt
Advanced Member

2766 Posts

Posted - 06/21/2010 :  23:19:14  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Thanks, I'll look into the T7500 issue. I tested with Penryns but maybe not Merom.

On the Aux Temp, what sensor did you choose in the selector? Also, which ones were offered?
They will differ by machine.

Basically the Aux parameter isn't converted in any way by the program, it reads what the
sensor sends. Many ACPI sensors don't give meaningful data, I have discovered. My P7230
reports a constant 27C for its ACPI sensor, though some serious BIOS hacking can
convince it to display what is apparently a sensor below the CPU, which reads several
degrees below the on-die sensor. Very flaky.
Go to Top of Page

842x5
Starting Member

4 Posts

Posted - 06/22/2010 :  09:15:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
tmt -> "On the Aux Temp, what sensor did you choose in the selector? Also, which ones were offered?"

BattStat offered "ACPI Zone 1" (which doesn't do anything) and "Nvidia GPU". I chose the latter one because it relates to the graphics chip in my laptop (Nvidia Quadro NVS 135M).

It strikes that the temp offset of both, CPU and Aux readings seems to be off by roughly the same amount. Maybe a systematic "feature". Btw, with BattStat 0.98 there was no difference in CPU temp to my reference tool (I8KfanGUI)...

Edited by - 842x5 on 06/22/2010 09:23:07
Go to Top of Page

tmt
Advanced Member

2766 Posts

Posted - 06/22/2010 :  12:28:54  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
You are the first person to have tested the NVidia GPU support! I implemented it for
a specific platform that turned out to not have temperature monitoring in the chipset.
I thought the mobile NVidias didn't support it at all, but left it in anyway. Let me
poke around on that chip you have, and see if the software support is correct for it.
Go to Top of Page

tmt
Advanced Member

2766 Posts

Posted - 06/22/2010 :  17:18:01  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by 842x5

the graphics chip in my laptop (Nvidia Quadro NVS 135M).

Do you have the NVidia control panel UI installed, and if so does it report the current
GPU temperature in the "Performance" group along the left? What is the difference reported?
Go to Top of Page

842x5
Starting Member

4 Posts

Posted - 06/23/2010 :  04:43:32  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by tmt

quote:
Originally posted by 842x5

the graphics chip in my laptop (Nvidia Quadro NVS 135M).

Do you have the NVidia control panel UI installed, and if so does it report the current
GPU temperature in the "Performance" group along the left? What is the difference reported?




Nvidia control panel needs ntune installed. Then it reports GPU temperatures. I ran the stability test: GPU temp went up to 75C but BattStat reading was at 39C static... So it seems that BattStat does not pick up the temp correctly (at least for my setup)
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 11  Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
LeoG.net Ultra-Portables Forum © Copyright LeoG.net 2001-2010 Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.07